Steve Farhood: “To me, Tyson Fury lost the lineal title when he retired for personal reasons”

18 mars mission essay english dissertation abstract sample procedural essay topics benny paret sample essay analysis go here brave new world argumentative essay graphic organizer free scholarship without essays actden essay topics architecture reflective essay introduction literature book paraphrasing means follow url go source how do you cite a website in an essay mla aclepsa buy propecia are erythromycin and zithromax the same first class dissertation examples pdf alternative for viagra australia cialis reeteli mi satlyor follow site examples of thesis statements for evaluation essays cialis guitar riff help with phd homework writing assignment essay graduate school write burn robert statement thesis Submitted by on Tue, 18 December 2018, 01:31

Hall of Famer boxing announcer Steve Farhood has been working with Showtime boxing since 2001 and recently celebrated his 40th year in boxing. When not working fights with ShoBox: The next generation, Farhood frequently scores some of the biggest Showtime championship boxing events, including their most recent, the controversial decision between Deontay Wilder and Tyson Fury that Farhood scored 115-111 for Fury.

In part 2 of my “On The Ropes” boxing radio interview with Steve Farhood, I get his views on Deontay Wilder’s performance¬†against Tyson Fury, that some have criticized. Farhood also talks about what both could do differently in a rematch and gives his thoughts Fury’s heavyweight champion claim. Additionally, Steve shares his thoughts on HBO signing off and boxing moving to a streaming format. Here is what Steve Farhood had to say.

Jenna J: A lot of people have been critical of Deontay Wilder’s performance against Tyson Fury, saying that he loaded up too much on his punches. What did you think of the way he fought Fury?

Steve Farhood: I think it’s very easy to be critical of Wilder but here’s the thing, there’s never been another heavyweight in history who fights like Tyson Fury, who has his size, reach and mobility. There’s never been anyone like him. While it’s very easy to criticize Wilder for missing badly, loading up and not punching to the body enough, it’s all understandable, Fury did this to Klitschko too. I know Klitschko was older and perhaps somewhat diminished at that point, but this is what this guy does.

Is it going to be different in a rematch? It’s not going to be easier for Wilder if he fights the guy twenty times. I’m not all that critical of Wilder as some people have been and I just think you have to remember who he was fighting. He was fighting a guy who is not easy to fight and who fought his gameplan and carried it through.

Jenna J: There’s a lot of interest in a rematch now. Is there anything Wilder can do differently that will allow him to have more success?

Steve Farhood: I certainly think he needs to use the jab more. It’s easy to say that he needs to pressure Fury, but Wilder is not a pressure fighter who wants to get close, he wants distance so he can land his big shots. He has to get started faster. I think getting used to Fury’s rhythm and the fact that he went twelve rounds with him, I think that will help Wilder. I would think he will be favored to win again as he was in this fight, though not by very much.

Fury would have to fight a very similar type of fight, I don’t see big adjustments for Fury — although perhaps Fury has been emboldened by his success because once you have gotten up from the kind of knockdowns he got up from, I think you probably have more confidence. I think both guys can take positives from what happened on December 1st.

Jenna J: Going into the fight, there was a lot of talk about Tyson Fury being the lineal champion. A lot of people will say that it doesn’t mean anything and others say it does, how do you view it?

Steve Farhood: The reason I might not give it as much credence as under normal circumstances is because he retired and left boxing. If he was the lineal champion and left boxing, you can argue that that takes away his lineal title because he retired. Had he never retired, that would be different.

I don’t want to give the alphabets too much credit and Wilder is obviously an alphabet champion with the WBC, but there’s something to be said about lineal titles. It kind of overrides the alphabets at times because we know the alphabets can be nonsensical in who they choose to be champions and who they give title fights to. To me, Fury lost the lineal title when he retired for personal reasons.

Jenna J: Steve, Boxing is starting to transition to streaming and with that we saw HBO sign off on showing boxing, what are your thoughts on this transition?

Steve Farhood: Well, two very major things happened there. I think Showtime was at the forefront of the streaming, we have been streaming fights for a long time. It is clearly a major part of the future. I’m not saying television is going to go away, certainly not. Television isn’t going to go away and pay-per-view isn’t going to go away.

Streaming is a significant part of it just because of the technology and young people don’t have cable anymore necessarily and they do everything via apps. It’s hard for someone my age to totally comprehend because I came from a different era but the fact is, that is the world we are living in today.

As far as HBO, I was saddened. I’ve watched HBO from day one, who hasn’t? They’ve had a lot of great fights and a lot of great fighters. You can’t totally say it just happened, there’s reasons why it happened and I’m not going to get into them now. On the last show, unfortunately I don’t think the fights were very interesting but the broadcast was well done and there are a lot of very talented people who work at HBO and that’s who I think about.

Written by

18 Responses to "Steve Farhood: “To me, Tyson Fury lost the lineal title when he retired for personal reasons”"
  1. Heavyhitter says:

    Tyson Fury is the king of the division, period. Title, not title, lineal title, who cares! He is the best and that is all that matters.

  2. GreatONE says:


  3. OctoberRed says:

    Did he actually retire or take time off?

    • BillyBoxing says:

      When you stop fighting for something you lose it.

      That’s true with boxing especially when you don’t fight and don’t train for 3 years, was a 400 lbs Fury still the best HW in the world?

      Def not and I like Tyson and wish he was awarded the decision last week.

  4. Tonyu says:

    There’s no such thing as a Liberal Champion it’s utter rubbish this title suddenly rose out of nowhere. If Lennox Lewis suddenly decided to box again or Vutsku Klitschko or any other heavyweight that retired as Champion who would be Lineal Champion, all if them. The only Champions that should be recognised is WVA,WBC,IBF AND WBO the rest is non sensible.

  5. Ray* says:

    He wasn’t fighting for almost 3 years. I mean you can ignore facts and try and follow any bandwagon but i would prefer my “Lineal” champ to be an active one.

  6. ShoulderRoll says:

    He was good enough to be the man who ended the Klitschko era.

    Those skills are obviously still there.

  7. Andre_parker1 says:

    to be the man,you’ve got to beat the man and fury did exactly that..he’s the lineal champ

  8. DuckAdonis says:

    Well we all just saw him beat a Heavyweight champion as his first Real test back so I think he can have the lineal status again!

  9. P4Pdunny says:

    can see the logic behind this, funny though after all that time out he came and arguably beat the champ

  10. Laligalaliga says:

    Some call it fancy belts when it doesn’t fit their agenda.
    As a HW fighter, what is your aim, target or goal? Am sure we all know the answer but some like to get it twisted if their man doesn’t hold the cards.

    It’s an old trick.

  11. Lazy Jab says:

    Fury leaving left the top spot vacant. The #1 & #2 haven’t reestablished the lineage. Fury back in the picture challenging the #1 or #2 in Wilder and drawing… it can be up for debate. It can also be debated that he defended that crown against Wilder in a fight he arguably won. Fury’s my boy though, I may be biased but hes performed in the ring as. Champ should against a very worthy challenger in Wilder

    • !! Shawn says:

      I think this is a reasonable argument. Lineal Champ retires ish, comes back, fights current champ, draws (draw goes to the lineal champ right?) although we all know he won, so how is he not still the lineal champ, he still is the man that beat the man, and he just proved it again.

      He also inarguably, a much easier time with Klitchko than Joshua, so there is that…

  12. Toffee says:

    He can call himself lineal champ. He’s certainly got the strongest current claim to it.

    But the title has been up for debate plenty of times. This isn’t a unique scenario.

    Let’s face it, we know who the best fighters are in any era. Who holds the belt(s) is just a matter of timing. Then every now and then someone comes along and unifies the lot to legitimise the historic lineage.

    So basically, we need a Fury/Joshua fight. 1 v 2. And it would be good if one of them could pop over to the states and beat Wilder at some point to get all the belts in one place.

  13. SuperHanz says:

    Fury remains the man who beat the man and no amount of crying will change that fact.

  14. Robbie Barrett says:

    Fury isn’t lineal. Only Wilder and Fury fans keep claiming he is because they have an agenda.

  15. SA96 says:

    He’s the man who beat the man. You can’t lose lineage unless a new lineage is created. If Joshua and Wilder fought while Fury was out of the ring, then a new lineage would have been created.

leave a comment